![]() |
Passengers are entitled to compensation if their flights are delayed by three hours or more, but a legal challenge by airlines has seen claims put on hold |
Passengers whose flights are delayed by three hours or more should be entitled
to compensation from airlines, according to a senior European Court of
Justice (ECJ) official.
Yves Bot, an ECJ advocate general, has opposed a joint legal challenge by
British Airways, easyJet, Tui Travel and the International Air Transport
Association to compensation rules introduced in November 2009.
Although his statement does not amount to a legal ruling, the ECJ is expected
to make a binding decision on the challenge in the coming months.
Under current regulations passengers flying to or from an EU, Swiss, Norwegian
or Icelandic airport, or with an EU, Swiss, Norwegian or Icelandic-based
airline, are entitled to meals and refreshments and free telephone calls or
emails if their flight is delayed by three hours or more.
They are also entitled to compensation of between £200 and £480, depending on
the distance of the flights. However, airlines do not have to pay
compensation if they can prove the delay is not their fault, and has been
caused by “extraordinary circumstances”.
Airlines’ concerns about the additional cost of providing such compensation
were heightened by the six-day shutdown of European airspace caused by the
ash cloud in Iceland and since August 2010, the legal challenge by BA,
easyJet and others has seen all claims for compensation put on hold by
British airlines.
A spokesman for BA said: “We are aware of today's non-binding opinion given by
the advocate general and we await the final ruling in due course.
“The European Court of Justice ruling from November 2009 has come under
criticism from many parties and we also believe the ruling was wrong.”
Nick Trend, Telegraph Travel's consumer correspondent, suggested that even if
the ruling is upheld, a sudden change in what passengers are entitled to
claim is unlikely.
"Cash compensation only applies if the delay is the airline’s fault," he said.
"If the airline can show that the delay is caused by 'extraordinary
circumstances' - it does not have to pay compensation.
"Unfortunately, the definition of 'extraordinary' covers most delays,
including those caused by bad weather, fog, air traffic control or other
strikes, political instability and one off incidents such as the ash cloud.
In practice, it is only in a relatively small proportion of cases, such as a
technical problem with an aircraft, when the airline becomes liable."
0 komentar:
Speak up your mind
Tell us what you're thinking... !